Is it true that uncircumcised men are more likely to get AIDS virus? - aids virus more condition_symptoms
I went to a conference, and said something, but gave no further details, he mentioned something about cell receptors.
Monday, December 7, 2009
Aids Virus More Condition_symptoms Is It True That Uncircumcised Men Are More Likely To Get AIDS Virus?
6 comments:
The answer to your question is yes and no. "Yes, this is a circumcised man is more than ten times more likely to contract HIV from unprotected contact with an HIV-positive. No, uncircumcised men are generally more at risk *, if you participate in unprotected sexual activity.
The cellular receptor "Langerhans cells are present in high concentrations in the foreskin, but actually viruses such as HIV, HSV and HPV * Tighten (HIV, herpes and genital warts), and the cause of increased risk. Hygiene has no influence on the impact of Langerhans -making cells, and the only way to inactive or delete or) dead skin (both the result of two different types of circumcision.
All major studies have shown a dramatic reduction of HIV transmission from unprotected sex for men who are circumcised. There is no rational argument against the data, except those that circumcision for any reason, however, * *, and they do not want more information about Global ten (! () Who studiesView a period of six to ten times higher risk, regardless of their geographical location) to urge the public.
NO. Anyone can do it if the practice of unprotected activities associated with men or women. This is the state of the world.
Indeed, recent research shows that this is true. It is believed that the hot and humid between the foreskin and the shaft is an ideal place for HIV to stop, long enough to start coming problems.
Do not be circumcised Elävät risk of disease if not properly cleaned, so versitial AIDS is not care.
No, it is hypothetical.
It seems very unlikely that I - I think it has taken most people who are affected by AIDS, in the mouth, anus or vein was still.
Post a Comment